Motorcycle helmet laws...good or bad? Do you wear or not? - motorcycle helmet painting
I'm going for many years. I wear a helmet, because I know that the road can make the head and brain. I went to the speed of the road and carried the picture of my Bell Star XL, but not next to my head. I know that a large percentage of the injuries motorcycle critical point, had to return the local hospitals to "a neighboring state without a helmet law. Require my condition. How do you feel about insurance and those who do not not choose to wear a helmet?
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Motorcycle Helmet Painting Motorcycle Helmet Laws...good Or Bad? Do You Wear Or Not?
17 comments:
I think it's a big pit leads all the time. Especially after I saw my friends brain debris from the road with a shovel.
I ride a Harley and wear a helmet when I ride and you never know when you can go into a corner on the dirt road and have someone pull in front of them and I do not feel that the insurance does not, you should have the necessary security to install equipment
I do not support mandatory helmet laws for adults. The child is full, yes. Adults should be able to decide for themselves. The same goes for seat belts. And yes, I wear a helmet when I ride and my seatbelt while driving - by choice.
I lived in one of the few states that adults can ride with a helmet. I made a couple of times, just to remind me how it feels to feel especially uncomfortable. A bit like driving a car without seat belts ... I think I had long enough to be comfortable to wear all appropriate safety equipment, and not to prove I'm macho, not to ride him.
Pat B. Why not increase your insurance premium if you choose to wear a helmet? It can be shown that helmets reduce the risk of severe injuries to his head, and when this risk, why not pay it to decide to cover the additional risk? More or less the same idea as the cost of smoking to health insurance because of the additional problems of smoking.
I first organ donor riders without helmets. About the insurance should be required to wear a helmet or risk not covered in an accident.
I first organ donor riders without helmets. About the insurance should be required to wear a helmet or risk not covered in an accident.
Not wearing a helmet is stupid. Ive seen what happens, someone with a helmet and its definition is not pretty.
The truth, I can not use it when you're traveling. Maybe that 80% of the time ... yes ... the remaining 20% ... no. I have all three, but ... Complete, 3 / 4, and half of the city. Your question implies that you would to higher insurance premiums for people who do not wear the helmet to see. I disagree. Life is a game ... Bets that we have an accident and the insurance is not bet. The profits of insurance companies suggests that they have the winning hand. Any insurance company, reduced its rate, since wearing a helmet and throw me, as it sometimes? You and I know that will not happen.
If someone decides not to wear his helmet on his reputation, and I do not think insurance should be increased. I could understand if it will increase speed and maintain insurance Cought because they jeopardizing someone's life, but if you wear a helmet on you and hurt someone, your mind. Wear a helmet is not in my opinion, retarded and stupid.
If someone decides not to wear his helmet on his reputation, and I do not think insurance should be increased. I could understand if it will increase speed and maintain insurance Cought because they jeopardizing someone's life, but if you wear a helmet on you and hurt someone, your mind. Wear a helmet is not in my opinion, retarded and stupid.
If someone decides not to wear his helmet on his reputation, and I do not think insurance should be increased. I could understand if it will increase speed and maintain insurance Cought because they jeopardizing someone's life, but if you wear a helmet on you and hurt someone, your mind. Wear a helmet is not in my opinion, retarded and stupid.
It should not even the pilots of blame for the accident, because one can not predict what the others do, as you could not wear a helmet. on the street, no one can still order an explosion or a rabbit, and that all that is necessary. his illness is not only 1 of the Act, which states that helmets always and everywhere.
I wear a face (helmet and face shield open). Should it be mandatory ... No, this is the good choice. If the insurance costs higher for non-helmet cyclists? I do not know, but ask yourself this ... Should it be higher for those who do not wear the armor? What about those who do not wear the long sleeves and long pants or shoes or gloves? Look at this way, and I believe the helmet is not a big deal and made our love for riding safer, but some believe that the bikes (with Dirtbikes, ATVs should be, etc.) prohibited. When comparing the safety of a bicycle for a car ... if this is not a contest. I want to take me for the rest of my life because I do not want the choice to remove them. In this sense, I mean, not the fact that some children in the city. I agree with them, because all Nutjobs 2-bit (it contains to speak) of cells can cause an accident and kill one of us. But how many people want the bikes off the road at all stops. In some cases, we do not agree with us and hold. What I like paying to her by the insurance (and taxes) ... no. But I do not pay to rebuild houses in flood areas again, the land of hurricanes, tornadoes, broker or costs of medical care for smokers or consumers either unhealthy. It sucks, and if you find how to fix ... Well, I have for you as president.
Is it really safe to wear a helmet and those who prefer to kill the
Head injury is the leading cause of death in motorcycle accidents.
I ride a Harley and a full helmet, because there are two kinds of cyclists: Those who are as follows, and they will fall.
Post a Comment